Age Rating

Older patients typically utilize more and higher cost health care services than younger patients. One way states can ensure that coverage remains affordable for everyone is to support the use of age rating bands that spread premium costs over a range of age groups. For example, in a state with a 5:1 age band, the ratio limits the amount an older individual will pay to no more than five times what a younger individual pays in premium dollars.

The ACA limits the age band to 3:1 starting on January 1, 2014. Consequently, premiums will spike for young adults – the very people experts agree are needed to help balance out the insurance risk pool. For example, moving from a 5:1 age band to a 3:1 age band will cause premiums to increase significantly for individuals under the age of 30 – potentially outweighing any subsidy benefit that may be available under the ACA.

Younger individuals and families that are subject to rate shock are likely to decide against getting coverage or may drop their existing health care plan. This will further drive up the cost of coverage for everyone else in the insurance pool.

Latest Documents

Impact of Changing Age Rating Bands in “America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009” - [PDF]

Oliver Wyman has developed an actuarial model to study the impact of different reform proposals on the individual and small employer health insurance market.  According to this model, if the age band is compressed to 3:1, premiums for the youngest-healthiest third of individuals would be 35% higher in Year 1 compared to reform with 5:1 rating bands.

Other Reports/Papers | 09/28/09

Health Plans Support Consumer Protections

Washington, DC - Health plans today reiterated their strong support for new market rules and consumer protections to cover all Americans and guarantee coverage for pre-existing conditions. "Health insurance reform is an essential part of health care reform", said AHIP President and CEO Karen Ignagni.

Press Releases | Strategic Communications | 07/29/09